Top 5 Most frivolous lawsuits that actually won
Ah, the art of litigation. One might be the misconception that the claims are matters typically dry, but this would neglect the millions of creative lawsuits that have arisen in everything from being too bright Bowling for beer really does not make women nicer. And while most of these cases are driven by the Judges, the real art is in the few who pass through the judicial system – and the result in the bank actual applicants.
Here are some of the top 5 weird crazy claims, frivolous or plane that actually won.
Cafe hot, cold hard cash
Perhaps one of the most famous cases of frivolous litigation was the 1994 lawsuit against McDonalds for making their java in dangerously high temperatures that resulted in injury to 84-year-old woman Stella Liebeck. This resulted in a payment of 640,000 dollars and the case Liebeck later became a hot topic for discussion on small claims increased in the early 90's, and the decision was so unexpected that McDonald's had previously denied multiple attempts to settle, claiming that never expected to get in trouble for serving coffee the way customers are like it. "
But at least one client certainly did not like, but after the successful application you can imagine her saying "I'm lovin 'it."
The mean tightrope
One would think that a man who makes his living beating people half-naked body in the wrestling ring would be a nice tough to break down, but according to Brian Blair – a professional wrestler once – a trip through some simple dishes at local Italian restaurant in 2001 was enough to ruin his career. That's right – A professional wrestler Italian Grill Carrabba sued for ruining his career by leaving a tray of dirty dishes around.
"It called the dog do it for me, "Blair said in a deposition.
Now, it might be tempting to see things from such point of view – was won life by a very physical, and play and if he had been incapacitated by the fall, then you should award punitive damages. But months after your injury is, Blair went on to compete in several more games before finally retiring in 2002 – the same year decided to make a run for public office.
Ultimately, the lawsuit was "amicably" settled out of court for an undisclosed sum of money and although he disappeared from the wrestling scene, sightings of the dog roaming Blair innocent Italian restaurants in search of street plates continue to be reported to this day.
IT'S CENT OVER 9000!
While most of us associate with rodeos in nabbing lawsuits huge amounts of money – some are in it the principle of the thing. This is the case with Canadian border guard Julien Yves in December 2003 brought an action against the Border Patrol for failing to refund a sandwich 9 dollars paid for overtime at work. Although he was receiving the standard one and a half working overtime payment, Julien claimed that the lack of money for meals was unfair. So I did what any normal person suffering from obsessive compulsive disorder would – decided to take their battle to court.
Demand is spread over five years, among the numerous judgments, the fight against the judgments, resolutions against the bar and infinity, etc. before that was finally awarded her $ 9. Julien then proceeded to celebrate his victorious battle of 5 years' duration using the money to buy a six pack to drink Labatt Bleu alone and without friends in his apartment in the dark.
Majorly MINOR IRRITANT
Some of us can remember Ed McMahon as the friendly companion, once on The Tonight Show with Johnny Carson, but is largely shed that image with a series of demands that has reaped great rewards for the artist in trouble financial. In addition to being sued for not paying his divorce lawyer, McMahon has been known for his fondness for sharing judgments himself, most of them frivolous was against his home insurance company over a mold blamed for contributing to the death of his beloved dog.
At the time of application, hysteria serious had swept the sensitivity of Beverly Hills residents on concerns that a minorly irritating mold once had mutated into something toxic. And although the Center Disease Control dispelled this myth, McMahon was an astronomical dollar pay $ 7 million.
In the end, all I found was irritating to residents complaining of Beverly Hills.
PART 2 HOT COFFEE
All right – despite the name that has come to be associated with this frivolous lawsuit particular has nothing to do with hot coffee, burns or McDonalds. It refers, of course, the now infamous lawsuit against Rockstar Entertainment over the inclusion content hidden porn in its blockbuster video game Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas. Although the content has been disabled in the game itself, and accessible only by piracy software, eager lawyers and opportunistic politicians jumped on the bandwagon outrage to point the finger at everyone from the ESRB (Head Note for games) to the Commission Federal Trade, and of course Rockstar itself.
The controversy surrounding the content at one point became so heated that it was nicknamed "Hot Coffeegate." And, of course, where there is controversy, lawsuits – as presented by the 85-year old Florence Cohen who bought the game for her grandson 14 years, despite it is far from reaching the age limit recommended by the ESRB.
The lawsuit eventually led to Rockstar recalling the game from the shelves until a cleaner version can be sent in addition to offering a $ 35 refund to anyone who wanted it. However, one has to wonder how many of us would even know about the content if there had been all this fuss, and at a time checking out porn is as common as checking our e-mail, is it really necessary to spend our time in a pixelated penis?
I doubt it.
Anyway, I think the lesson learned is that due to the miracle of modern judicial system, within each person, tree, flower and blade of grass is a lawsuit waiting to happen. It is only until it arrives.
About the Author
Ben Goldman is a writer for Yodle, a business directory and online advertising company. Find a lawyer or more law articles at Yodle Consumer Guide. Top 5 Most Frivolous Lawsuits that Actually Won
Mount Pleasant SC Lawyers – Fritz Jekel and Paul Doolittle Attorneys at Law
|
|
Toxic Mold Litigation $10.00 Mold law and litigation is a complex new area and often requires numerous professional disciplines to address it. Detailed information is often difficult to fine and this book is designed to provide you with that information. It provides you with critical background information to put the “mold issue” in context, including information on exposure, illness, allergic reactions, types of claims filed… |
|
|
Homeowners, insurers spar over spores in toxic-mold cases.(Ballard v. Fire Insurance Exchange)(Texas): An article from: Trial $5.95 This digital document is an article from Trial, published by Association of Trial Lawyers of America on September 1, 2001. The length of the article is 1952 words. The page length shown above is based on a typical 300-word page. The article is delivered in HTML format and is available in your Amazon.com Digital Locker immediately after purchase. You can view it with any web browser.Citation Detail… |
|
|
Toxic mold: what you should know about it and what you can do about it. (Perspective).: An article from: Real Estate Issues $5.95 This digital document is an article from Real Estate Issues, published by The Counselors of Real Estate on June 22, 2002. The length of the article is 1321 words. The page length shown above is based on a typical 300-word page. The article is delivered in HTML format and is available in your Amazon.com Digital Locker immediately after purchase. You can view it with any web browser.Citation Details… |
